The Bow Times
Google
WWW yourneighborhoodnews.com
"YOUR HOMETOWN NEWS"

 

We welcome opinions on topics of local interest! Send a letter to the editor!

Remember to include your name, hometown and daytime phone number (we won't publish your phone number). We reserve the right to edit for length and legal considerations. Send a letter.

Editorial

Vote Tuesday, Nov. 2
Susan Clark, Editor, The Bow Times
Don’t let the Tuesday, Nov. 2 elections pass you by without having your voice heard.

Take the next few days to reflect on the condition of the state of New Hamsphire and the country. Do you like the way things are going? Is the state better off than it was two years ago? Do you agree with how the country has been run over the last four years?

Bow, Dunbarton, Hopkinton and Contoocook, and Concord have faced many challenges – growth, the threat of pollution and potential illness posed by a power plant, preservation of open spaces, state school funding issues, increases in medical and drug costs, crime, etc.

Since Sept. 11, Americans have lost certain liberties in the fight against terrorism. The main effect has been families being torn apart as young men and women go off to war. Some soldiers return, others do not, and some who have returned are not the same – case in point, Dave Guindon, a National Guardsman from Merrimack, took his own life in August two days after returning from Iraq.

Are we safer than we were four years ago? While the Patriot Act was said to protect us, has it only stripped us of some of our civil liberties?

While nominations to the Supreme Court seem distant to us in New Hampshire, it will affect us in every way from rights granted to each state to a woman’s right to choose.

We must decide which road we want our representatives in Concord and Washington to take. If we choose not to vote or do not look into the issues before casting our decisions, we only have ourselves to blame.

­ Susan Clark


Guest commentary
The 2004 Dunbarton tax rate is up and here are the reasons

by Judith Dionne
Staff Writer

Kids should not have to bury kids. They should not have to go to a funeral service and gather together and comfort one another. Their parents should not have to comfort them and try to explain the complex emotion of grief; emotions that they themselves don’t understand.

Katie and Ally Hinck were memorialized at a service on Oct. 20, at St. Catherine’s Church in Manchester.

Kids were there, crying. Parents were there, crying and comforting their children. All wondering why. But no one has the answer.

As I stood outside, waiting in the line of hundreds of people, I noticed how cold I was. I even commented to my friends that I hoped we didn’t get left outside. Then I thought how selfish that was. I was here being able to be cold. Beyond that, it was a beautiful day. One of those beautiful fall days that really lets you appreciate the season. The sky was azure, the deep yellow, red and burnt-orange foliage against it was breathtaking. It made me feel really guilty for complaining.

Later, during a eulogy to her sister, Sandy LeBlanc recalled one of her earliest memories of their young families spending time together. She said they went up to the White Mountains to see the fall foliage. I thought, “How ironic. It’s such a beautiful day. The foliage is so nice. They can’t share that ever again.”

It reminded me how life goes on. Autumn will change and will give way to winter. Sandy continued and spoke of times when they were children and they used to ice skate together. Winter will give way to spring and summer.

Sandy continued to speak and recalled their times together at the beach.

Life goes on. But how do they cope?

Sandy’s daughter, Tanya, recalled the last time she saw Ally. They had spent the day together with their new puppies. She said Ally and Katie had talked them into getting the puppy. She will always remember that day with Ally.

The puppies will grow and time will continue. How ironic Ally won’t be there to see her puppy grow.

We’re all left on this earth to wonder why. The priest at the service said, “We shouldn’t be here today. This should never have happened.”

He’s right. It shouldn’t have happened, but it did.

The turnout at the service lets the family know they’re not alone. Everyone shares in the loss. Loss is person, however, but everyone touched by it feels it. Everyone identifies with it. We pray that won’t be us someday.

For the family, they must know that life will go on, but in a different way.

I went to that service for my dear friend and her family. I spoke with my friend as she spoke about her feelings and her husband’s feelings; he lost his sister.

As I left the service, I knew they would be OK. Never the same, but OK. Their family bond is so strong. The stories they recounted about Katie and Ally spoke volumes of the closeness of this family. The seasons will change, the holidays will come and go. Katie and Ally will live on through stories and the memories. The loss will remain raw, real, but this family will be OK.

Katie and Ally, because their faith, are surely with God now. They are in a better place. It is those of us left on earth that have the raw deal. We’re left to wonder, cope and heal.

Katie and Ally will be missed dearly, as evidenced by the turnout at the service, but they are so much better off than we.


Letters
The 2004 Dunbarton tax rate is up and here are the reasons

To the Editor:

Recently, it was announced in the newspaper that the Dunbarton tax rate for this year has risen close to $5 and that most of this increase was attributable to the school tax portion.

The board is writing this letter to the taxpayers of Dunbarton because we would like them to understand the financial background for this increase.

Back in February and March of 2004, we announced in both The Goffstown News and The Bow Times that the expected school tax rate would increase by approximately $7.18 and explained why. We also provided this information at our School District Meeting in March, and in the school newspaper sent to all residents of the town.

Shortly after the close of the school fiscal year on June 30, 2004, it was with a degree of some relief that we realized from the August statements that we were going to be able to decrease the amount of money to be raised for the next school year by $335,470-plus. This sum was the result of the following three major items:

1. A last minute New Hampshire State Legislative vote raised our adequacy grant from $306,840 to $526,505, for a difference of $219,665.

2. An increase in the unexpended fund balance of the school budget from the predicted $77,000 to $192,805, an increase of $115,805.

3. The town’s total appraisal increased to approximately $8 million this year, which helped to lower the tax.

All together, these items gave us a total of $335,470-plus, which when used in calculating the school tax rate, brought the estimated increase of $7.18 down to the current $4.56. This rate is about $2.62 less than previously expected.

Keep in mind that our state adequacy grant for 2004-05 is still $131,012 less than during the last school year ending in June 2004. Also, we are receiving more than $20,000 less in federal grants and a decrease of $74,000 in catastrophic aid from the state of New Hampshire. The state portion of the school tax rate is figured on gross appraisal minus utilities and is $4.50 this year, down $1.22. All these changes in funding also resulted in the need to raise more money by the local school tax dollar this year than last year to make up for the reductions.

Part of the total tax rate increase is a raise of 49 cents on the county level, largely a result of decreased state funding. The town portion of the tax rate decreased by 21 cents. This brings the total tax rate increase in 2004 to $4.84 over last year’s rate.

The Dunbarton School Board strives to keep all residents informed of our actions and to give residents specific knowledge about the reasons for the tax increase they see in their bills.

The board conscientiously strives to balance the interest of taxpayers and school needs at every opportunity.

We realize the cost is difficult for all of us, especially since one year ago the board was able to reduce the school tax rate by $3.44, which translated to a $3.09 decrease for the entire town tax rate.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call any board member.
The Dunbarton School Board
John Herlihy, chairman
Betty Ann Noyes, vice chairman
and members Debra Foster, Brian Little and Rene Ouellet

I am appalled at the increase in the Dunbarton tax rate

To the Editor:

I don’t know how many of you out there were appalled at the increase of $5 per thousand to our property taxes here in Dunbarton, but I can surely say I am.

First of all, if the town and school budget meetings are held in March, why is it that the entire increase is added only at the end of the year? If our taxes are going to be raised this significantly, wouldn’t it be appropriate to have the increase divided into the two payments for July and December?

I also find it interesting that the news of our increase shows up as a small article in The Bow Times only a few weeks before the bill arrives.

Once again, it seems that the school needs more money. Just how much would be enough to satisfy this constant thirst for money? I realize that the teachers want more money each year, however, what about the rest of us who cannot get increases enough to cover this incredible hike to our taxes?

It is interesting to see how Goffstown’s rate is lower than ours by approximately $21 per thousand – and they have a high school for which they have done substantial repairs.

Rest assured, when our houses are revaluated next year, this town will lose more people. All one has to do is take a ride around town to see all the for sale signs, which speaks volumes on what is going on here.

It shouldn’t surprise anyone, however, when it comes to spending someone else’s money for education, there seems to be a bottomless pit.

Would that be true if everyone paid to educate their own children? I highly doubt it!
Janet Gora
Dunbarton

Tom St. Martin is thoughtful, articulate and compassionate

To the Editor:

If you live in Bow, Candia, Dunbarton, Hooksett or Manchester (Wards 1, 2 and 12), I encourage you to vote for Tom St. Martin for state Senate.

Tom grew up in New Hampshire and has raised a family here. He has a complete understanding of what is great about our state as well as the issues that challenge us. Even more importantly, Tom sees the “big picture” and knows that problems like school funding, access to healthcare, and protecting the environment do not exist in a vacuum. Solving them not only benefits us locally, but will also make both New Hampshire and our country even stronger.

Tom has served us before –first in the U.S. Navy and later as a state representative. The personal sacrifice required of both of these roles demonstrates his willingness to work for us. More than ever, we deserve a candidate that will speak for the people of New Hampshire.

If you’ve had the pleasure of meeting Tom, I’m sure you will agree that we will not find a more thoughtful, articulate or compassionate candidate on any ballot this year. Seldom do we have such an opportunity to vote for a candidate that is so right for the job, so prepared to serve us, and so committed to the future of New Hampshire.

On Nov. 2, please cast your vote for Tom St. Martin for State Senate District 16.
Bobby Nord
Candia

Operation Linebacker does ring a bell for me – here’s why

To the Editor:

In response to Mr. Goulet, first – Welcome Home Rich, and also to all our men and women veterans who put on the uniform for their country. I am glad we can write.

As to Operation Linebacker of Dec. 72, yes, it does ring a bell on the impact it caused on both sides. It did persuade the North Vietnam Communist to return to the conference table, but it was too late. With the statement “John K. having guts about speaking out,” I and many of U.S. think not. For all the activity of Kerry’s anti-democracy protest and his leadership of the VVAW and association with Jane Fonda was just unbelievable. You see, General Vo Nguyen Giap, Vietnam’s most decorated military leader wrote “that if not for the un-American activites created by stateside protest, Hanoi would have ultimately surrended.” (Operation Linebacker?) Oh well!

Now as to Mr. Kerry, by his own doing, many believe that he violated the UCMJ, the Geneva convention and the U.S. Code while serving as a Navy officer and Reserve time left, when he met with the North Vietnam Communists in Paris. These meetings and Kerry’s coddling of Communists while leading mass protest against our military brings to mind the statement of “giving aid and comfort” to the enemy. Former Navy pilot Paul Galanti remembers his jailers at the Hanoi Hilton in North Vietnam, playing English language radio broadcast of Kerry’s April 1971 testimony before Congress.

So, I say to all the readers, think about what our POWs and our military men and women heard. What voice (Kerry). Imagine the reality of today hearing Kerry from the Oval Office, the same voice your jailers (North Vietnam) used 33 years ago.

How close of a traitor was Kerry? How close are they?

United we stand, divided we fall.

So Richard, it seems we disagree, but that is no problem, because we can agree to disagree.
Ray Cote
Bow

Respect individual’s rights

To the Editor:

Saturday night, Oct. 23, around 11 p.m., we heard crackling in our front yard, got up quickly and saw car lights shining on our signs and the distruc-tion of our Bush-Cheney sign.

This type of behavior is disgusting. Well, whoever you are, guess what! The sign is up again.

We are very upset at what you did, but also saddened to think how low you will go to try and make your point that who we are voting for does not happen to be your choice.

We as Americans are supposed to be living in a free society.

We should respect an individual’s right to make his or her choice of political party without harassment.

We hope all eligible Bow residents will register to vote on Nov. 2, and use this very important right which will voice your opinion in this election.

God bless America.
Marge and Dick Welch
Bow

What’s a loyalty oath, anyway?

To the Editor:

Why is it that George W. Bush has allowed insurgents to steal tons of explosives from a weapons depot that should have been guarded in Iraq, yet he won’t allow a person expressing their right to free speech to attend a rally if it appears they might be a Kerry supporter? What is a “loyalty oath” anyway? I thought this was America.
Jonathan Colcord
Concord

Troopers continue to protect

To the Editor:

Over the past few months, the citizens of New Hampshire have heard more from the New Hampshire Troopers Association than ever before. The question has been asked, “Why”?

The New Hampshire Troopers Association is comprised of 260 Troopers. We live, work and interact with New Hampshire’s citizens in every area of the state 24 hours a day.

New Hampshire’s citizens rely on their New Hampshire Troopers and have very high expectations of us.

They expect us to make accurate, factual based judgments, when enforcing the laws of the state.

It is a natural extension of our duties to continue to serve the citizens of this state by verbally getting the word out to them on who is working in the best interest of New Hampshire and who is not.

When we make public comments, they are based on facts. We are not about politics. We are continuing to protect the people of New Hampshire as they expect from their troopers.
John M. Cody
Vice President
New Hampshire Troopers Association

Hopkinton fights Bio Energy actions, not Dell’Orfano’s name

To the Editor:

Mr. Dell’Orfano, we, the residents of Hopkinton and the surrounding community, consider Bio Energy a bad neighbor not because of your ethnicity but because of your actions.

You are attempting to destroy our community by covering our towns with toxins.

These toxins have been proven to cause irreparable harm to humans, especially young children. You are willfully attempting to increase the blood levels of lead and mercury in my family solely to line your organized group’s pockets with money.

What do you suggest I call someone that is attempting to cause harm to my child?

Just because you received governmental approvals does not mean your actions are harmless. Perhaps you have never heard of Love Canal, DDT, Agent Orange, lead sinkers or asbestos siding.

From the January 1979 EPA Journal, “What is worse is that (Love Canal) cannot be regarded as an isolated event. It could happen again anywhere in this country unless we move expeditiously to prevent it.”

The residents of Hopkinton and the surrounding communities are not against industry. We, a strong majority, are against anyone, whatever their name, that is determined to pollute the environment with a total disregard for the long-term health effects on all living things.

We are moving expeditiously to prevent it!
Laura Z. Morgan
Hopkinton

Bow has made balanced land use decisions; hope it continues

To the Editor:

It is a very rare occasion where I feel the need to send a letter to the Times. However, the tirade by John Moscillo regarding Bow Highlands provokes this response. He asked several questions that would not have been necessary if he took the time to learn how the process of development works in our town and our state.

Based on his assertion of making a living in real estate, I suspect he knows most of the answers to his questions and just doesn’t like the answers.

Everyone is entitled to their opinions and philosophies. Elitism reigns supreme in the Moscillo example. Bow would not be the great town to live in that it is if elitism had been the prevalent feeling over its history. I am glad that our regulatory boards and Town Meetings have made reasonable and balanced land use decisions in the past and I hope that trend continues in the future.
Gil Rogers
Bow

NH Supreme Court justices: vote no on amendment question

To the Editor:

To the citizens of New Hampshire:

On Election Day, Nov. 2, only one proposed constitutional amendment will be on the ballot. We are asking you to vote “No” on this amendment because we believe it would fundamentally alter the structure of New Hampshire government.

This amendment would change Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution. It seeks to give administrative control of all New Hampshire courts to the legislature. The amendment, despite the claims of its proponents, does not remedy some imbalance of powers among the branches of government; in fact, it fundamentally alters the fine balance among them.

Today the administration of the New Hampshire’s courts is the responsibility of the chief justice and the justices of the Supreme Court. The administration of the court system includes the hiring of court personnel, the assignment of judges, the scheduling of cases and many other matters concerning the day-to-day operation of the courts of our State. For decades, decisions regarding such matters have been the responsibility of the courts, not the legislature.

The independence of each of the three branches of government was established by our Constitution in 1784. Part I, Article 37 states that the three branches “ought to be kept as separate from, and independent of, each other, as the nature of a free government will admit...” That independence should not be eroded by the passage of the proposed amendment. At best, seeking to transfer administration of the courts to the legislature creates the prospect of years of unnecessary constitutional crisis. At worst, it destroys the thoughtful structure established by our founding leaders in which each branch has the ultimate responsibility to administer its own affairs.

We know that writing this letter is an extraordinary measure. We do so reluctantly and only because we believe there are good reasons why our predecessors removed the courts from politics; they believed, as we do, that the people of New Hampshire are best served by courts that are not subject to political administration and partisan control.

For these reasons, we ask the citizens of New Hampshire to reject this amendment and preserve the constitutional balance among the branches of government that has served the public well for over 200 years.
Chief Justice John T. Broderick Jr.
Associate Justice Joseph P. Nadeau
Associate Justice Linda S. Dalianis
Associate Justice James E. Duggan
Associate Justice Richard E. Galway