|
Weare
Weare in spotlight after U's. Supreme Court decision on eminent domain case
By Nicholas Brown
Staff Writer
With a population around
9,000 residents, it's not often
that the town of Weare is at the
center of a national political
issue. But when it rains it apparently
pours, as evidenced by the
gargantuan flood of e-mails and
phone calls received by town
employees recently.
In response to a recent United
Supreme Court ruling that
allows local governments the
power of eminent domain for
private enterprises, a California
company approached the
town of Weare with a proposal.
And subsequent support of that
proposal, however caustic, has
jammed the town's phone lines
and filled its electronic inboxes.
On Monday, June 27, Logan
Darrow Clements faxed Weare's
building department head, Chip
Meany, a letter requesting information
on starting the application
process for building a hotel
in Weare.
The proposed site is the home
of US Supreme Court Justice
David H. Souter, one of five justices
who formed the majority in
the court's ruling.
In a press release, Clements
wrote that "the City of Weare
will certainly gain greater tax
revenue and economic benefits
with a hotel" at the location, as
opposed to those generated by
Souter's property.
Clements, dubbing his vision
the "Lost Liberty Hotel," said
features would include the "Just
Desserts Cafe" and a museum
showing "a permanent exhibit
on the loss of freedom in America."
The hotel, Clements wrote,
would also feature a copy of
Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged,"
as opposed to a Gideon's Bible
in each room.
While town officials said no
official application has yet been
submitted by Clements, many
town employees have been bombarded
by by messages from
enthusiastic supporters of the,
thus far, hypothetical project.
Board of Selectman Chairman
Laura Buono said she's
gotten between 400 and 450
e-mails from supporters nationwide,
offering donations or help
in hotel construction. Buono
added that other selectmen have
received even more solicitous
e-mails, and that new messages
are still appearing.
"I have to give (Clements)
credit in his effort," she said. "I
think they're definitely trying to
make a statement."
Despite Clements. successful
marketing, selectmen publicly
diffused the California man's
plan in about five minutes at
their Tuesday, June 28, meeting.
"As a selectman, I have no
desire to take anyone's property
just to satisfy a political movement,"
Buono said at the meeting.
Buono's statement was met
by apparent approval from the
rest of the board.
Tina Laramee, administrative
assistant in the town's building
department, said she's received
"too many calls to keep track
of."
"There are a lot of annoying
calls," she said. "People have
been calling to make reservations
or invest in a hotel that
doesn't even exist."
Since Clements hasn't followed
procedure for filing an
application, Laramee said most
of the callers get the same treatment
from the town.
"We give them the phone
number for Mr. Clements," she
said, adding that "it's very difficult
to deal with because you
don't know if the person calling
is serious or if it's just someone
trying to make a point."
Adding to calls from supporters
of the phantom hotel project,
Laramee said, have been calls
from about 20 members of the
media, some national.
Buono said many of the messages
she's recused have demonstrated
a clear lack of knowledge
about the town.
"It's pretty obvious that a
majority of them know nothing
about Weare," she said, adding
that many have referred to the
town as a "city," and have promised
to spend lots of money in
Weare's "many shops."
Both Buono and Laramee said
that if someone were to properly
file an application for such a
project, they would certainly get
their due consideration.
But until then, it seems, the
town may be giving Mr. Clements
a bit of his own medicine.
Repeated calls from The
Goffstown News to Clements's
phone were unanswered. An
automated message said no
more messages could be left, as
the voicemail system was filled
to capacity.
|